The Dismal Reality Behind Online Glamour - Instablogs
The Dismal Reality Behind Online Glamour
Stevo , Dothan: Feb 7 2009
Made Popular Feb 7 2009
United States :

The Dismal Reality Behind Online Glamour

So the first thing you probably noticed was that I spelled glamour with a “u” more than once already. I like British spellings of many words, get over it.

“Online Glamour” seems to be the hot things these days. Due to the rise of online social networking and instant communication, especially thanks to the likes of Youtube, people who would otherwise have led anonymous lives and kept their peculiarities to themselves now can immediately record themselves doing something dangerous, insane, or outright stupid, post it online, and become massively well known throughout the online community.

But the big break doesn’t stop there. Eventually, said individuals will end up on the nightly news, at which time it becomes more “real.” Never forget, as important as the online world might be for people age 40 and under, many 40+ individuals still look at it as one of the new-fangled contraptions of the ever expending boundaries of technology and thus consider it beneath them. But these people do watch the nightly news, so naturally this comes of a certain kind of reality to them once it hits that point.

So this sounds great! Anyone can be a star! Hurray for MySpace (or myspace or however you spell it!) and Youtube!

...until you hit the dark side of it all, the dismal reality that most of the popular people online are only popular because they’re making jack-asses out of themselves and people are laughing at them. Note, I say laughing at them, not with them.

Furthermore, having a million viewers on Youtube doesn’t actually make you cool in the eyes of the majority of people if you’re really an idiot- instead, it means that our culture has actually come to the point of breaking down, and people are so bored with reality that they don’t know what to with themselves except watch any lame thing they come across.

Second, there’s the part about the shameless self-promotion, also known as Cyber-Whoring. Some people just have a good idea (or an incredibly stupid one, or in the rare instance, a funny one), and the idea catches on with a little advertisement. Others, however, spend countless hours a day working towards getting adds on myspace and so on and so forth.

Can I just say...guilty?

Okay, well, I’m kind of guilty. Maybe for a week or so I did that, and I do submit my blogs to search engines and such. Then again, I actually have something worthwhile to say - I don’t just provide entertainment, I provide education and provoke depth of thought. Big difference.

Back to the griping- some of these people actually do such a bad job that someone from Hollywood offers them a movie deal, a record deal, a book deal, or whatever. They enter the world of entertainment and get paid lots of money.

So wait. We pay people who provide mere mindless entertainment millions of dollars, but people who actually contribute to the overall cultural well-being and progression get paid in crappy peanuts? What’s the matter here?

Basically, we’ve taken the Court Jesters of our era and made them into miniature gods, while divorcing ourselves from any sense of genuine spirituality and good-will towards other humans, as evidenced by the rise in the idiot fundamentalist Christian population.

When it all comes down to it and the culture collapses and all civilization as we know it end, do we really want the anthropologists and archeologists in the year equivalent to 7000 CE to cite Britney Spears and Chris Crocker as being the epitome of the world we knew?

Too many smart-asses have already answered yes to that question.

As usual, I’ll stay in the minority and say no.

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
ARVIND K.PANDEY
PRAYAG, India
”So wait. We pay people who provide mere mindless entertainment millions of dollars, but people who actually contribute to the overall cultural well-being and progression get paid in crappy peanuts? What’s the matter here?”

............That’s a sad reality of our times. Very well said.A very interesting and thought provoking article.A small advice to you:Just remain in ”minority”.Keep barking and whenever you get an opportunity never miss to bite such ”smart asses”.
1 Stars
Michael Kerjman
The Earth, Australia
I open this article after my comments on your ”Willy Wikipedia” were written, submitted and published.

Thank you for joining this blog.
1 Stars
Me Enki
New York City, United States
”When it all comes down to it and the culture collapses and all civilization as we know it end, do we really want the anthropologists and archeologists in the year equivalent to 7000 CE to cite Britney Spears and Chris Crocker as being the epitome of the world we knew?”

See that rotten thing in the back of the refrigerator? Why try to save or revive it? Why not just throw it out?

Why are we so intent on saving this culture? I think from everything you wrote there is really nothing to save. Lets have a clean sweep and move on already.
1 Stars
Stevo blog.myspace.com/pea..
Dothan, United States
That’s a fair point, indeed, a good question.

(I tried to respond to this once already and my internet cut out.)

I think I might have neglected to emphasize the other aspect, that we are in an era of rapid of progression of technology and insight into reality, both at the human and cosmic levels. The problem really lies in the fact this swept away for the sake of someone like Britney Spears, the fact that people would rather watch a TV show that isn’t actually funny and pretend that it is than read a book, and...well, I could rant on and on.

In part, I kind of think our culture is already at its end and will have to be rebuilt- but that doesn’t mean we should through out the ”technology and insight” we have.
1 Stars
Me Enki
New York City, United States
When George Washington and the patriots got rid of the King and the British did they throw out all technology and insight of the enlightenment?

What are you talking about ”throw out the ’technology and insight’ we have.”

I said clean sweep of this culture, not complete genocide of all people like Pol Pot.
2 Stars
Stevo blog.myspace.com/pea..
Dothan, United States
Oh, I guess I misunderstood what you were trying to say in the first comment then- you’re saying that we should just go ahead and toss out Britney and company instead of continuing to pay attention to it, and I was understanding you to say that we should do away with Western culture totally. Sorry about that, mate.

I think we’re in agreement but approached the subject from two different angles, and then semantics got in the way.
Add your Comment